Also, I didn’t mean to call you foolish, just meant to communicate that the ranking doesn’t make sense to me. I didn’t mean it as a personal attack or anything like that.

I’ve thought about doing my own rankings, but I don’t to put in the time (ha!), so I’ll just make the occasional comment. At the end of the day rankings don’t matter for anything but generating discussion, so I’m not actually upset about this, just discussing.

As I said either here or on one of the forums. Huntley should have dropped and that was an over site that will be corrected.

Where he falls, not sure right around 15-16. Mind you that McIntosh lost to MN back-up also. Sometimes we overlook things, it happens.

If you want “career” rankings, these are not those. We base them on this season and the most recent results. I would suggest intermat, they tend to put more weight on the career. An example is Martinez of wyoming moved up three straight weeks after losing, even after he lost his spot.

You seem very passionate and I respect that, feel free to do you own, with Carter 4th. You can call me foolish or anything else you wish,.

Even if you are only looking at this year… It’s true that Carter had a close win over Ramos at the end of December, but he also had a not-close-at-all loss to Stieber in December.

Simply put, Carter had not done nearly as much to prove himself as Oliver and Ramos–he had the one elite win. Now, a month later, this is still true: Oliver, Ramos and Stieber have all have better collections of wins than Carter. He should be ranked 4th. Carter is ranked #1 entirely because of his close win over Ramos. In light of that, it looks very foolish to have him ranked over Stieber because Stieber has a much more impressive win over Ramos and also a dominating win over Carter.

Not only has Carter proven the least out of these four guys, he is also probably the concensus least-good of the four.

Just my opinion.